<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Does Open Mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.colecamplese.com/2009/08/what-does-open-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.colecamplese.com/2009/08/what-does-open-mean/</link>
	<description>My Place to Write, Share, and Remember</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.colecamplese.com/2009/08/what-does-open-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-49444</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colecamplese.com/?p=2176#comment-49444</guid>
		<description>The question of about what is an OER keeps ringing the old bells of learning objects, which IMHO boiled down to almost everything.

I&#039;ve not even gotten close to summing the OpenEd experience, but as you suggested a larger theme feels like &quot;its more than just resources/courses/content&quot;. For me, I got that in assembling my stories videos when Nancy White said, &quot;Openness is more than resources, it&#039;s an attitude&quot;.

It&#039;s soemthing most people there pretty muck grok at a DNA level, like &quot;duh&quot;, but we know out in the trenches, its like singing Sanksrit.

Please keep banging the Facebook issue- they way they partake of the richness of other open content sites for media, yet dont let it out the same way is... stingy. I refuse to upload any media sans one to Facebook:
http://cogdogblog.com/3351

&quot;Closed being a gradient of open&quot; intrigues me, zen like riddle, and perhaps we need to think about a sliding continuum rather than &quot;open or not&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of about what is an OER keeps ringing the old bells of learning objects, which IMHO boiled down to almost everything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not even gotten close to summing the OpenEd experience, but as you suggested a larger theme feels like &#8220;its more than just resources/courses/content&#8221;. For me, I got that in assembling my stories videos when Nancy White said, &#8220;Openness is more than resources, it&#8217;s an attitude&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s soemthing most people there pretty muck grok at a DNA level, like &#8220;duh&#8221;, but we know out in the trenches, its like singing Sanksrit.</p>
<p>Please keep banging the Facebook issue- they way they partake of the richness of other open content sites for media, yet dont let it out the same way is&#8230; stingy. I refuse to upload any media sans one to Facebook:<br />
<a href="http://cogdogblog.com/3351" rel="nofollow">http://cogdogblog.com/3351</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Closed being a gradient of open&#8221; intrigues me, zen like riddle, and perhaps we need to think about a sliding continuum rather than &#8220;open or not&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

